Osteology Everywhere: Storm King Edition

I’m spending part of this summer in southern New York, and have been doing my best to distract myself from various overdue manuscript drafts by exploring the area. To that end, a few friends and I went to an outdoor sculpture park at the beginning of June. I’d never heard of this place until it featured in a recent episode of Master of None:

After finding out that the art center was only a 45-minute drive away, we hit the road a few days later. Storm King in the flesh is about as bizarre and spectacular as you’d expect.  The undulating landscape spreads out across 500 acres, and is dotted with stands of trees, meandering dirt treks, and over one hundred enormous sculptures.

Storm King – View from between South Fields and Museum HillSome of the metallic behemoths seemed strangely familiar. It turns out that one of the artists responsible for many of these sculptures – Mark Di Suvero – also has a piece outside of the University of Michigan Museum of Art, one that I walked by on a near-daily basis for seven years.

Orion (2006). Mark Di Suvero.

The first sign that Storm King might provide fodder for an osteology everywhere post was that we found…osteology…everywhere. In the course of ambling about the park, my little group stumbled upon two different pieces of fragmentary animal bone. I’m no zooarchaeologist, but I’m pretty sure the bone on the left is a proximal bird humerus, while I would guess that the bone on the right is a deer tibia [any readers who are faunal experts are welcome to chime in to correct me here if I am in the wrong].

Faunal bones
Despite the preponderance of weathered iron sculptures, the most striking piece of art at Storm King isn’t made of metal. After exploring the South Fields our group walked just beyond the Storm King Wall (Andy Goldsworthy, 1997-1998, yes it is one of the art installations), to find a field that looked like it was plucked from a Lewis Carrol fever dream.

Storm King WavefieldThese waves of turf are another unexpected piece of art – Maya Lin’s “Storm King Wavefield.” Lin is also the architect responsible for the Vietnam Veterans Memorial in Washington D.C. The wavefield actually also featured in Master of None, in a scene where Dev piggybacks Francesa across a field:

Master of None at Storm King WavefieldActors Ansari and Mastronardi are being quite respectful of Lin’s work, since the appropriate way to traverse the wavefield is by walking between the crests. Some of the local youths gallivanting about the place ignored these directives, and it was while staring at the young people, brow furrowed disapprovingly, that I noticed that the wavefield is also an example of osteology everywhere.


From this perspective, don’t the waves look like stretched-out anterior superior and anterior inferior iliac spines?

ASIS and AIISWhatever the reason, to me the gently undulating terrain was strikingly reminiscent of the anterior illium.

BicycleIf you’re ever in the Hudson River Valley and have some time to kill, I strongly encourage you to check out Storm King for yourself!

Image Credits:
 Master of None screenshot from Netflix. Orion photo from University of Michigan, here. Master of None at the wavefield found at nypdecider, here. Hyperlinked angry cat from 9gag, here.

Posted in Osteology Everywhere, Travel | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Osteology Everywhere: Heliconia Edition

When I spent a week at the Hog Island Audubon Camp in Maine last year to visit my friend Cleo, the experience made me realize how little I know about the natural world. The names of even basic north-eastern birds sounded like something out of a Lewis Carrol poem – grebes and eiders and auks and guillemots. It also became clear that I’m not a dab hand at naturalist descriptions. When asked to describe a bird I normally point to “that fat black one” or “that tiny one zipping around and being annoying.” Sadly, my ineptitude also extends to flora, as became evident when I first attempted to ask the internet about this peculiar plant I photographed in Bangkok:

“Yellow flower Thailand,” I googled fruitlessly. “Yellow flower triangular leaves,” “weird yellow flower Bangkok.” Fortunately, I remembered that Google has an image search function, rendering my ineffectual keywords moot.

It turns out that this is a flower called the Golden Torch (more formally named “Heliconia psittacorum x Heliconia spathocircinata cv. Golden Torch“). According to the all-knowing internet, the “x” in between the two species names indicates it’s a hybrid, while the “cv” means that it is a cultivar. Wikipedia describes 194 species in the Heliconia genus, most of which are tropical. Many are equal parts bizarre and beautiful, both in appearance and nomenclature. For example, we have Heliconia rostrata (also called “lobster claw”):

Heliconia rostrataand Heliconia psittacorum (aka “parrot’s beak” or “parakeet flower”).

Heliconia psittacorum
The collective Heliconia genus can also be referred to as “lobster claws,” “wild plantains,” or “false bird-of-paradise.”

Heliconia plant
While the diverse and descriptive names are certainly compelling, the reason I found these plants fascinating was because they reminded me forcibly of a horse mandible. To wit:

The seeds themselves look more like human premolars than horse teeth:

Either way, a bizarre and intriguing plant. Now to go find some osteology where it actually belongs – within in progress manuscripts!

Image Credits: Heliconia rostrata image from gardeningknowhow.com, here. Heliconia psittacorum photo from myjunglegarden.com, here. Final Heliconia image (species unknown for now) found here.

Posted in Osteology Everywhere, Travel | 2 Comments

Syllabus: Inequality and the Body in Archaeology and Bioarchaeology

A Pittsburgh salad

As you may know, I spent this past year in Pittsburgh, figuring out when and where it is appropriate to say “yinz” and eating Pittsburgh salads.

However, I also had a position at the University of Pittsburgh Center for Comparative Archaeology. As the torch has just been passed to the 2017-2018 Visiting Scholar  Claire Ebert, it seems like a good time to discuss what I did besides inadvertently festooning my office with snack foods.

My primary professional responsibility was co-teaching a graduate seminar with another faculty member, in my case Liz Arkush. I pitched the course Inequality and the Body in Archaeology and Bioarchaeology:The first half of the seminar was focused on intersections between inequality and aspects of identity such as gender, age, disease, and disability. The second half of the course covered links between inequality and broad political or economic transitions– namely agriculture and colonialism – as well as different kinds of mortuary practices, focusing on sacrifice and post-mortem manipulation of human bones.

This was my ANIMATED agriculture slide. None of my students appreciated this as much as I did, making me feel like a Dad with his first selfie-stick.

A handful of the readings were inspired by mortuary seminars I’ve taken in the past – one called Social Life of Death with Nicole Couture at McGill University, and one called The Archaeology of Death and Burial with Rob “No Relation” Beck  at the University of Michigan. The heavy Andean bent of some of the meetings is a direct result of Liz introducing me to a new and fascinating regional record, and I included a number of readings from related fields, including social epidemiology, cultural anthropology, medical anthropology, and history. In future expanded iterations of the seminar I plan to break up disease and disability into two sessions, add a unit on “social deviancy,”and include warfare and slavery in the second half of the course.

On the last meeting of the seminar I had a terrible, debilitating cold, lending my voice a mellifluous Darth Vader-style huskiness. I offered students donuts and my most thematically appropriate earrings as compensation.

In the fall semester we had 14 students (12 archaeologists, 2 bioarchaeologists) and in the winter semester we had 8 (6 archaeologists, 2 bioarchaeologists), a drop-off rate that is fairly consistent with other years of the course due to heavier workloads in the winter semester. Faculty within anthropology always had an open invitation to attend, and older graduate students would drop in for particular topics that interested them. All told this created a wonderful environment for debate, with both bioarchaelogists and archaeologists at all career stages chiming in to discuss how best to discuss inequality in the archaeological record.

Many participants from the fall and winter semesters, celebrating the end of the year at a pizza place in Bloomfield.

I’m attaching the syllabus as a pdf here. Future versions of this seminar will likely run between 12-14 weeks, so I welcome suggestions for expansion for anyone working on similar topics. Happy summer everyone!

ANTH 2536:ANTH 2537 – Inequality and the Body in Archaeology and Bioarchaeology Syllabus

Posted in Bioarchaeology, Syllabus, Teaching | Leave a comment

AAPAs 2017 – New Orleans

Photo Credit: The inimitable Sarah “Shark” Jolly (University of Pittsburgh). I assume that the beverage is iced tea…

Beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets Beignets Beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets Beignets Beignets beignets Beignets Beignets beignets. Beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets – Beignets beignets beignets beignets Beignets Beignets beignets Beignets Beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets, beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets Beignets beignets beignets Beignets Beignets Beignets. Beignets, beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets, beignets, beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets Beignets:

Translation: I have just arrived in New Orleans to participate in the 2017 American Association of Physical Anthropologists meetings. The past few months have been a whirlwind of travel – I’ve been to both Penn State and Brynn Mawr to give invited talks, and recently returned from a week in Vancouver for the SAAs. Accordingly, it was something of a slog to have to once again prepare for a few days out of town, especially since I have a bevy of unfinished tasks waiting for me at my apartment in Pittsburgh:

I’m hoping that my landlord simply won’t have any reason to stop by.

However, I’m excited about this year’s meetings for two reasons. First, I once again get to nerd out about teeth at the Dental Anthropology Association meetings on Wednesday, April 09. This year’s workshop is on “Tooth Crown and Root Morphology.” The flyer indicates that coffee is included, which is potentially unwise for all involved given how much coffee I drink.

The second reason I’m excited is because I will be presenting a poster about…drumroll….teeth! (Yes, I need more hobbies.) If you’re interested in watching a bioarchaeologist appear semi-professional only to dissolve into an explosion of profane muttering as they discover the inevitable typos on their poster, come visit. Details here:

Title: A new method for estimating age from deciduous teeth in archaeological contexts
Date: Thursday, April 20
Location: Carondolet
Poster #: 9
Time: 1:30-6:30 pm (I will be there from 1:30-2:00)
Session: Human Dental Anthropology: Health, Disease and Other Cool Stuff with Teeth

If for some reason you have a conflict (read: are busy eating beignets somewhere), here’s the finished poster, though the image will be updated once I discover those aforementioned typos.

I’ll also be posting a link to the pdf on my Academia.edu page. Until then, I hope to see many of you at the meetings!

If you have trouble spotting me, I will be wearing a blazer and covered in powdered sugar.

Posted in Biological Anthropology, Conferences, Teeth, Travel | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

SAA 2017 – Manipulated Bodies: Investigating Postmortem Interactions with Human Remains

I’m currently in Vancouver, spending a few extra days in the city after attending the 2017 Society for American Archaeology meetings. At the moment I’ve been waylaid by a merciless head cold, but you don’t have to be at the top of your game to appreciate how beautiful this city is.

As if this view wasn’t enough, I snapped this photo on my way to dim sum. DIM SUM!

As is my wont, I’ve spent my free time in the city immersing myself in the local culture (eating), catching up with old friends (eating), making professional connections (eating), and taking a few moments to stop at the conference center overlook and ruminate upon the majestic mountains (while eating).

On the last day of the conference, I was also able to find the time to visit the UBC Museum of Anthropology, which has a reputation for being one of the best anthropological museums in the world. It did not disappoint.

However, despite all of my gallivanting about the city (eating), I was actually in town for professional reasons. I presented a paper on March 30, in a Thursday evening symposium titled “Manipulated Bodies: Investigating Postmortem Interactions with Human Remains.”  My paper focused on evidence for the postmortem manipulation of human remains in Late Prehistoric Iberia, touching upon the Late Neolithic–Copper Age sites of Bolores and Perdigões in Portugal, and the Copper Age site of Marroquíes Bajos in Spain.

The session was organized by Elizabeth Craig-Atkins, senior lecturer in archaeology at the University of Sheffield. The papers were geographically chronologically wide-ranging: we moved from the British Neolithic to the Iberian Copper Age, followed by the British Bronze Age, Roman Iron Age, early Anglo Saxon period and medieval period, and closed with discussions of historical Romania, contemporary Britain, and Hong Kong. It was nothing if not an eclectic mix of papers.

Despite the diversity represented within these case studies, a number of overarching themes tied the session together. Many of the Late Prehistoric through Medieval papers touched upon communities’ frequent interaction with the dead, the selection of specific elements or individuals for burial, the movement of bones across and between mortuary spaces, the blurring of initial ritual context over time, and the repeated use of mortuary spaces, even over periods separated by hundreds of years. The historical and contemporary presentations demonstrated radical shifts in mortuary practices over the course of even one or two generations, particularly in tandem with larger changes in global economies, migration patterns, or political regimes.

Being a prehistory snob, I was surprised at the degree to which some of the papers on more recent societies resonated with things I had been thinking about in the context of my own research. For example, Steven Gallagher, who is a law professor at the Chinese University in Hong Kong, gave a presentation on secondary burial practices among the Chinese diaspora. In Hong Kong, secondary burial practices continue to this day, even in the face of tightly controlled regulations, underscoring the continuing importance of forms of forms of mortuary practice we often unthinkingly relegate to the prehistoric sphere. Similarly, the “Continuing Bonds” project introduced by Lindsay Büster uses archaeological case studies to facilitate discussions of death, dying, and bereavement between health care professionals and patients. This kind of work makes it clear that a modern Anglo-American perspective, where death is a taboo that is tightly spatially and temporally constrained, is insufficient for understanding the complex web of interactions between the living and the dead in the past.

Our discussant was Anna Osterholtz of Mississippi State University. In her discussion, she emphasized a series of intertwined themes that were woven throughout the papers in this session, including materiality and immateriality, as well as space and place. I found the latter two a particularly compelling pair to think about.

Rothwell Church

Many of the presentations, diverse as they were, resonated because I’ve recently been reading a lot of literature emphasizing the re-use of mortuary spaces at points in time quite distant from their initial construction. Within our session, Elizabeth Craig-Atkins and Dawn Hadley‘s papers on the Rothwell Charnel Chapel emphasized that three out of five recent radiocarbon dates fell between 1250 and 1450 AD, when archaeologists had anticipated that the chapel would have been used. However, surprisingly, the remaining two dates were from the 18th and 19th centuries, several hundred years later. Similarly, Ian Armit, of the University of Bradford, described the mortuary assemblages in the Covesea Caves of Northeast Scotland, which contained both Early Bronze Age (c. 2500-1500 BC) and Roman Iron Age human remains, from nearly a millennium later.

Covesea Caves

In my own presentation, I referenced a Copper Age mortuary area at the site of Marroquíes Bajos that shows Early Bronze Age reuse, several hundred years after the initial funerary depositions were made. I also described the site of Bolores, a Late Neolithic – Early Copper Age artificial rock shelter where ten burials have been dated to 2800-2600 BC…but an eleventh interment was dated to 1800 BC, nearly one thousand years later. My collaborator Colin Quinn has noted a similar pattern in the radiocarbon dates at the Bronze Age Mound of the Hostages in Tara, Ireland, where a single burial was interred in the mound several hundred years after all other mortuary activity had ceased.

Probably a fair bit of mnemonic density kicking about here.

All of this suggests that we as archaeologists need to be particularly attuned to the potential of mortuary sites to experience multiple periods of use and re-use in prehistory. In my own presentation, I referenced a term that archaeologist Katina Lillios has used to describe mortuary spaces in Late Prehistoric Iberia. She refers to a quality called mnemonic density, “the potency of spaces or things resulting from their repeated use over long periods of time and their accumulated…memories, associations, and meanings” (2014: 8). Though at first glance quite eclectic, the papers in the “Manipulated Bodies” session underscored the extent to which the re-use of mortuary space was an important element of many different kinds of prehistoric mortuary rituals, and that this attention to the mnemonic density of burial spaces was likely a recurring feature of prehistoric mortuary rituals in Europe.

The session has certainly given me many things to consider in my research going forward, which I suppose is the point of conferences (besides eating).

Image Credits: Continuing Bonds header from Continuing Bonds project website, here. Photograph of Rothwell Church from University of Sheffield, here. Covesea Caves photo from Society of Antiquaries of Scotland, here. Photo of Stonehenge from English Heritage, here.

Lillios, Katina T. 2015. Practice, Process, and Social Change in Third Millennium BC Europe: A View from the Sizandro Valley, Portugal. European Journal of Archaeology 18(2): 245-258.

Posted in Bioarchaeology, Conferences, Travel | Tagged , , , , | 3 Comments

Wolff’s Law

Ever heard the expression “use it or lose it”? That pithy phrase encapsulates Wolff’s law, an anatomical rule that describes how bone grows and changes over time. The law was developed by German surgeon Julius Wolff, whose name you will now always remember due to the clever visual pun embedded subtly in the portrait below.

Visual puns mean that you will not forget his nameIn essence, Wolff’s Law states that bone is added where there is a demand for it and removed where there is not. As White summarizes in his Human Osteology glossary, “bone is laid down where it is needed and resorbed where not needed” (2000: 53). Roberts and Manchester go into slightly more detail:

“Of particular relevance generally to occupationally induced changes in the skeleton was the law proposed in AD 1892 by a German anatomist Julius Wolff, known as ‘Wolff’s law of transformation’, which stated that bone will adapt to functional pressure or force by increasing or decreasing its mass to resist the stress (Kennedy, 1989: 134); formation of bone, for example, will sustain and distribute the load…This means that if the body is involved with a repeated activity, the skeleton will respond by becoming ‘larger'”(2005:144).

For example, in the entirely hypothetical scenario outlined below, Individual A is highly active, and his upper arm bones experience frequent bursts of dynamic loading (e.g. lifting mjolnir, pugilistic pursuits, etc.). In contrast, Individual B is far more sedentary, and rarely lifts anything heavier than a pencil.

Wolff's Law as demonstrated by Marvel superheroes

Using Wolff’s Law, we can predict that Individual A will have stronger humeri than Individual B, because both arm bones have responded and adapted to the differing loads that are placed upon them.

Wolff's Law as demonstrated by actual wolves

In case you were wondering, those are indeed miniature wolves. Visual puns for the win!

If I ever draft a post about the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, we are all in trouble.

Image Credits
: Julius Wolff portrait from Greenhill Osteopath, here. Wolff’s delightful wolf cap found here. Thor wielding mjolnir found here. Wimpy Steve Rogers found here. Wolf images both found here. Humerus found here. Sapir backdrop from Wikipedia, here. Original Worf face found here.

Roberts, Charlotte and Keith Manchester. 2005. The Archaeology of Disease. Third Edition. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

White, Tim D. and Pieter A. Folkens. 2000. The Human Bone Manual. Elsevier, Academic Press: Amsterdam.

Posted in Bioarchaeology, Bioarchaeology Vocab, Osteology | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Bone Broke Year in Review 2016

Monitor Lizard in Lumpini Park 2016

As 2016 vanishes into the aether like a monitor lizard slipping into the waters of Lumpini Park, it is time to reflect on the last year at Bone Broke.

A picture is worth a thousand words, so I’ll just leave this here.

Bone Broke posts per year 2013-2016

When thinking back on on my past year of blogging, I realized that I haven’t published as many posts as I have in the past. This is largely due to the number of important professional transformations that have characterized this year: New degree! New job! Same unlimited capacity for Pop-tarts!

For me the most important achievement of 2016 is obvious: successfully making khachapuri.


No, actually it was getting my PhD, the culmination of 7 years of equal parts hard work, mentorship, repressed impostor syndrome, and Pop-tarts. The year started with a series of smaller milestones, beginning with the publication of my pre-doctoral research in American Antiquity in January – if you’re into Z-scores, skeletal representation, and groan-inducingly punny titles, it’s worth a read. In April I attended the Society for American Archaeology meetings in Orlando, giving a talk on my Spanish research in a session organized by Katy Meyers-Emery of Bones Don’t Lie fame. Probably the most memorable part of the conference was being publicly chastised by discussant Lynne Goldstein for making my graph bars too light – fortunately she liked the rest of the paper.

DAA pin 2016

I followed up my stint in Orlando with a direct flight to Atlanta to attend the 2016 American Association of Physical Anthropologists meetings, presenting a poster co-authored by Marta Díaz Zorita-Bonilla on the isotopic results of my dissertation research at Marroquíes Bajos. In Atlanta I also attended my first meeting of the Dental Anthropology Association, a fabulous opportunity to nerd out with fellow researchers interested in human teeth. By May, I had submitted my complete dissertation to my committee, and my defense took place on June 03, 2016. At around this point in time I announced my plans for the 2016/2017 academic year – acting as a Visiting Scholar at the University of Pittsburgh, a position that allows me to to teach a graduate seminar while working on my own research.

Jess Beck dissertation defenseAbout a month after moving to Pittsburgh I sat down and thought about the strategies that had proved most useful when writing my dissertation, assessed my advice, realized there weren’t enough cats, and so produced my Top Ten Dissertation Writing Tips (as illustrated by cats). In late September, Katherine Kinkopf and I received word that our paper on bioarchaeological approaches to looting had been accepted in the Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports. In the chaos surrounding my dissertation defense, I had also forgotten to publicize an article in Open Archaeology that came out in May. This first article was co-authored with Colin Quinn, and describes how mortuary archaeology and bioarchaeology can be used to examine the emergence of inequality in past societies. Accordingly, to remedy my forgetfulness, I published a post in early November describing the topic of both papers and providing links to pdfs.

Cathedral of LearningOutreach
I didn’t post on the blog about outreach in 2016, but I was involved with a great NSF-funded program at the University of Michigan Ruthven Museum of Natural History called “Portal to the Public.” The program targeted graduate students who wanted to conduct science communication outreach, using two workshops – “How People Learn” and “Prototyping Your Activity” – which provided us with some background in how to engage museum visitors, particularly kids. I designed an activity called “Solving Puzzles Made of Bone,” that tasked participants with sorting and re-articulating various kinds of brightly colored animal bones. After presenting at two Museum Days – Time Discovery Day! in March, and the “Scientist Spotlight” in May – I received my official Science Communication Fellow certificate on May 22.

Preparing my activity station

Osteology and Anatomy
On July 19, I got all four of my wisdom teeth removed, a surgery I have been putting off for several years now. I was administered nitrous oxide and a a local anesthetic rather than going under. All told it was an interesting, albeit terrifying experience, in which I was able to hear the dentist drilling and snapping my lower third molars into quarters before forcibly tugging them out of my mandible.

If you ask, the dentist will give your extracted teeth to you post-surgery. When I eamined my teeth the necessity of removal was underscored by the fact that they had calculus on them, prompting a cascade of emotions in which my bioarchaeologist side vied with the side of me that hopes to be a reasonably hygenic person – “gross! cool! gross! neat! gross! fascinating!” Either way, the experience prompted a bioarchaeology vocab post on the phenomenon of calculus.

Osteology Everywhere and Bone Quizzes
2016 was a year filled with constant movement, beginning in Thailand in January, returning to Michigan, then visiting Orlando, Atlanta, Maine, Iceland, Pennsylvania, New York, Hungary, Romania, and Laos over the course of the year, before ending, once again, in Thailand. As is my wont, I’ve seen osteology everywhere over the course of my travels, beginning with an elephant statue at Asiatique in Bangkok, where, I’ll admit, the osteology angle was pretty obvious.

Sushi navicular!
After my return to Ann Arbor, I found a hamate in my beer at Good Time Charley’s, an establishment which I now miss due in part, I suspect, to the happy haze of nostalgia that surrounds much of my time in grad school. I also spotted a lunate in a little lithic in the Africa range in the Museum of Anthropological Archaeology, and a fossil femur in a tree root while hiking in Dexter. I arrived at the conference hotel at the AAPAs in Atlanta in April to find that the entire building had a highly anatomical architecture, and also spotted a sushi navicular at a nearby food court. In June, when visiting my external committe member in the Department of Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, I discovered a dens in a recovered meteorite (though it turns out that most people see a hamate). Finally, when visiting Maine just after defending my dissertation, I stumbled upon a set of intriguing faunal remains that I asked you all to identify when assigning my first zooarchaeological bone quiz – Bone Quiz 21.

Anthropological Miscellanea
As part of the ongoing saga first documented in 2014, this past year I also retrieved a (now skeletonized) bear paw from its resting place in a kindly faculty member’s backyard. After a stint macerating in a friend’s shed, it is currently ensconced in my freezer, waiting for me to finish prepping it. One of my goals for 2017 is to move on to the next stage of the process.

Bear paw revealed

Archaeological posts of 2016 fall into a miscellaneous grab-bag of categories. In January, I participated in a blogging carnival focused on outlining the “grand challenges for archaeology,” in which I highlighted the staggering lack of diversity in our discipline. In September, I promoted my friend and colleague Emily Holt’s fundraising campaign to start a video journal of archaeology called Dirt & Words – an endeavour that I am happy to report was successfully crowdfunded! In mid-December, I described some of the pilot fieldwork I conducted in Romania back in October, laying the groundwork for a bioarchaeology and mortuary research project that begins this summer. Finally, I ended the year true to form, by snarkily evaluating the the accuracy of the archaeology portrayed in the movie Suicide Squad

All in all 2016 has been an eventful year, full of challenges, changes, and exciting new developments. Here’s hoping for more of the same in 2017.

So Happy New Year everyone! May you greet the new year with all of the enthusiasm and optimism of a white-lipped pit viper balancing on the end of a small stick.

White-lipped pit viper

Posted in Blogging, Year in Review | Tagged , , , , | 4 Comments