Osteology Art: Alba Iulia

Hello from Alba Iulia, Romania!

FullSizeRender 2

After a mere 42 hours of travel, I arrived back in Transylvania on Thursday, July 13, to continue working on the collaborative project I began back in October.


Who doesn’t love waiting outside the beautiful Budapest airport at 1 am to catch an 8 hour van to south-western Transylvania?

After arriving, and fortifying myself with my favorite local fare with undue haste, I have launched into bioarchaeological data collection.

The American contingent of our team – consisting of myself, Dr. Colin Quinn (Hamilton College), and recent Appalachian State graduate Emilie Cobb – is here for three weeks doing some collections research with human remains from three Early Bronze Age sites that were excavated by our collaborator Dr. Horia Ciugudean. We’ve burrowed into the Muzeul Național al Unirii (National Museum of the Union), where we are greeted every day with an honest-to-goodness parade past our laboratory window:

I’ll post more soon about what we’re up to, as we’re on the cusp of launching a project blog.

However, in the meantime I feel the need to point out one of the endearing things about the Zona Tolstoi, the northern neighborhood we currently call home. Every morning, we have a 20-minute walk in to the museum, and when passing through a narrow alleyway to the side of a local café-bar, we are greeted with this wonderful street art:

I find it particularly appropriate given the nature of our research here. More soon – stay posted!

Posted in Data Collection, Osteology Art, Travel | Leave a comment

Osteology Everywhere: Mohonk Edition

As part of my summer campaign to explore the Hudson Valley region (read: to avoid working on manuscripts/cursing at R), I recently bought an annual membership to Mohonk Preserve. The preserve is just outside of the town of New Paltz, only about 45 minutes away from Poughkeepsie, and has miles of hiking trails with some amazing views of the surrounding landscape.


Trips to Mohonk and the nearby Minnewaska State Park also provide me with the opportunity to meet some of my New York neighbors, like this slightly suspicious Eastern Red-Spotted Newt:

and this iridescent Six-Spotted Tiger Beetle:


I particularly enjoy Mohonk because, unlike Shenandoah National Park or the Vassar College Farm, I have never gotten any ticks there. On a recent visit, I also hiked around Mohonk Mountain House, a gorgeous hotel perched atop a mountain lake that is, unfortunately, only accessible to the ultra-wealthy guests who sojourn there.

Mohonk Mountain House

It was on the way back down that I saw another instance of landscape osteology everywhere, akin to the sighting at Storm King (though this time not anthropogenic): superior and inferior iliac spines masquerading as hilltops:

Need a closer look?

I hope that you’re able to spot some orogenic osteology of your own this summer!

Posted in Osteology Everywhere, Travel | Tagged , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Osteology Everywhere: Storm King Edition

I’m spending part of this summer in southern New York, and have been doing my best to distract myself from various overdue manuscript drafts by exploring the area. To that end, a few friends and I went to an outdoor sculpture park at the beginning of June. I’d never heard of this place until it featured in a recent episode of Master of None:

After finding out that the art center was only a 45-minute drive away, we hit the road a few days later. Storm King in the flesh is about as bizarre and spectacular as you’d expect.  The undulating landscape spreads out across 500 acres, and is dotted with stands of trees, meandering dirt treks, and over one hundred enormous sculptures.

Storm King – View from between South Fields and Museum HillSome of the metallic behemoths seemed strangely familiar. It turns out that one of the artists responsible for many of these sculptures – Mark Di Suvero – also has a piece outside of the University of Michigan Museum of Art, one that I walked by on a near-daily basis for seven years.

Orion (2006). Mark Di Suvero.

The first sign that Storm King might provide fodder for an osteology everywhere post was that we found…osteology…everywhere. In the course of ambling about the park, my little group stumbled upon two different pieces of fragmentary animal bone. I’m no zooarchaeologist, but I’m pretty sure the bone on the left is a proximal bird humerus, while I would guess that the bone on the right is a deer tibia [any readers who are faunal experts are welcome to chime in to correct me here if I am in the wrong].

Faunal bones
Despite the preponderance of weathered iron sculptures, the most striking piece of art at Storm King isn’t made of metal. After exploring the South Fields our group walked just beyond the Storm King Wall (Andy Goldsworthy, 1997-1998, yes it is one of the art installations), to find a field that looked like it was plucked from a Lewis Carrol fever dream.

Storm King WavefieldThese waves of turf are another unexpected piece of art – Maya Lin’s “Storm King Wavefield.” Lin is also the architect responsible for the Vietnam Veterans Memorial in Washington D.C. The wavefield actually also featured in Master of None, in a scene where Dev piggybacks Francesa across a field:

Master of None at Storm King WavefieldActors Ansari and Mastronardi are being quite respectful of Lin’s work, since the appropriate way to traverse the wavefield is by walking between the crests. Some of the local youths gallivanting about the place ignored these directives, and it was while staring at the young people, brow furrowed disapprovingly, that I noticed that the wavefield is also an example of osteology everywhere.


From this perspective, don’t the waves look like stretched-out anterior superior and anterior inferior iliac spines?

ASIS and AIISWhatever the reason, to me the gently undulating terrain was strikingly reminiscent of the anterior illium.

BicycleIf you’re ever in the Hudson River Valley and have some time to kill, I strongly encourage you to check out Storm King for yourself!

Image Credits:
 Master of None screenshot from Netflix. Orion photo from University of Michigan, here. Master of None at the wavefield found at nypdecider, here. Hyperlinked angry cat from 9gag, here.

Posted in Osteology Everywhere, Travel | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Osteology Everywhere: Heliconia Edition

When I spent a week at the Hog Island Audubon Camp in Maine last year to visit my friend Cleo, the experience made me realize how little I know about the natural world. The names of even basic north-eastern birds sounded like something out of a Lewis Carrol poem – grebes and eiders and auks and guillemots. It also became clear that I’m not a dab hand at naturalist descriptions. When asked to describe a bird I normally point to “that fat black one” or “that tiny one zipping around and being annoying.” Sadly, my ineptitude also extends to flora, as became evident when I first attempted to ask the internet about this peculiar plant I photographed in Bangkok:

“Yellow flower Thailand,” I googled fruitlessly. “Yellow flower triangular leaves,” “weird yellow flower Bangkok.” Fortunately, I remembered that Google has an image search function, rendering my ineffectual keywords moot.

It turns out that this is a flower called the Golden Torch (more formally named “Heliconia psittacorum x Heliconia spathocircinata cv. Golden Torch“). According to the all-knowing internet, the “x” in between the two species names indicates it’s a hybrid, while the “cv” means that it is a cultivar. Wikipedia describes 194 species in the Heliconia genus, most of which are tropical. Many are equal parts bizarre and beautiful, both in appearance and nomenclature. For example, we have Heliconia rostrata (also called “lobster claw”):

Heliconia rostrataand Heliconia psittacorum (aka “parrot’s beak” or “parakeet flower”).

Heliconia psittacorum
The collective Heliconia genus can also be referred to as “lobster claws,” “wild plantains,” or “false bird-of-paradise.”

Heliconia plant
While the diverse and descriptive names are certainly compelling, the reason I found these plants fascinating was because they reminded me forcibly of a horse mandible. To wit:

The seeds themselves look more like human premolars than horse teeth:

Either way, a bizarre and intriguing plant. Now to go find some osteology where it actually belongs – within in progress manuscripts!

Image Credits: Heliconia rostrata image from gardeningknowhow.com, here. Heliconia psittacorum photo from myjunglegarden.com, here. Final Heliconia image (species unknown for now) found here.

Posted in Osteology Everywhere, Travel | 2 Comments

Syllabus: Inequality and the Body in Archaeology and Bioarchaeology

A Pittsburgh salad

As you may know, I spent this past year in Pittsburgh, figuring out when and where it is appropriate to say “yinz” and eating Pittsburgh salads.

However, I also had a position at the University of Pittsburgh Center for Comparative Archaeology. As the torch has just been passed to the 2017-2018 Visiting Scholar  Claire Ebert, it seems like a good time to discuss what I did besides inadvertently festooning my office with snack foods.

My primary professional responsibility was co-teaching a graduate seminar with another faculty member, in my case Liz Arkush. I pitched the course Inequality and the Body in Archaeology and Bioarchaeology:The first half of the seminar was focused on intersections between inequality and aspects of identity such as gender, age, disease, and disability. The second half of the course covered links between inequality and broad political or economic transitions– namely agriculture and colonialism – as well as different kinds of mortuary practices, focusing on sacrifice and post-mortem manipulation of human bones.

This was my ANIMATED agriculture slide. None of my students appreciated this as much as I did, making me feel like a Dad with his first selfie-stick.

A handful of the readings were inspired by mortuary seminars I’ve taken in the past – one called Social Life of Death with Nicole Couture at McGill University, and one called The Archaeology of Death and Burial with Rob “No Relation” Beck  at the University of Michigan. The heavy Andean bent of some of the meetings is a direct result of Liz introducing me to a new and fascinating regional record, and I included a number of readings from related fields, including social epidemiology, cultural anthropology, medical anthropology, and history. In future expanded iterations of the seminar I plan to break up disease and disability into two sessions, add a unit on “social deviancy,”and include warfare and slavery in the second half of the course.

On the last meeting of the seminar I had a terrible, debilitating cold, lending my voice a mellifluous Darth Vader-style huskiness. I offered students donuts and my most thematically appropriate earrings as compensation.

In the fall semester we had 14 students (12 archaeologists, 2 bioarchaeologists) and in the winter semester we had 8 (6 archaeologists, 2 bioarchaeologists), a drop-off rate that is fairly consistent with other years of the course due to heavier workloads in the winter semester. Faculty within anthropology always had an open invitation to attend, and older graduate students would drop in for particular topics that interested them. All told this created a wonderful environment for debate, with both bioarchaelogists and archaeologists at all career stages chiming in to discuss how best to discuss inequality in the archaeological record.

Many participants from the fall and winter semesters, celebrating the end of the year at a pizza place in Bloomfield.

I’m attaching the syllabus as a pdf here. Future versions of this seminar will likely run between 12-14 weeks, so I welcome suggestions for expansion for anyone working on similar topics. Happy summer everyone!

ANTH 2536:ANTH 2537 – Inequality and the Body in Archaeology and Bioarchaeology Syllabus

Posted in Bioarchaeology, Syllabus, Teaching | Leave a comment

AAPAs 2017 – New Orleans

Photo Credit: The inimitable Sarah “Shark” Jolly (University of Pittsburgh). I assume that the beverage is iced tea…

Beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets Beignets Beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets Beignets Beignets beignets Beignets Beignets beignets. Beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets – Beignets beignets beignets beignets Beignets Beignets beignets Beignets Beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets, beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets Beignets beignets beignets Beignets Beignets Beignets. Beignets, beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets, beignets, beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets beignets Beignets:

Translation: I have just arrived in New Orleans to participate in the 2017 American Association of Physical Anthropologists meetings. The past few months have been a whirlwind of travel – I’ve been to both Penn State and Brynn Mawr to give invited talks, and recently returned from a week in Vancouver for the SAAs. Accordingly, it was something of a slog to have to once again prepare for a few days out of town, especially since I have a bevy of unfinished tasks waiting for me at my apartment in Pittsburgh:

I’m hoping that my landlord simply won’t have any reason to stop by.

However, I’m excited about this year’s meetings for two reasons. First, I once again get to nerd out about teeth at the Dental Anthropology Association meetings on Wednesday, April 09. This year’s workshop is on “Tooth Crown and Root Morphology.” The flyer indicates that coffee is included, which is potentially unwise for all involved given how much coffee I drink.

The second reason I’m excited is because I will be presenting a poster about…drumroll….teeth! (Yes, I need more hobbies.) If you’re interested in watching a bioarchaeologist appear semi-professional only to dissolve into an explosion of profane muttering as they discover the inevitable typos on their poster, come visit. Details here:

Title: A new method for estimating age from deciduous teeth in archaeological contexts
Date: Thursday, April 20
Location: Carondolet
Poster #: 9
Time: 1:30-6:30 pm (I will be there from 1:30-2:00)
Session: Human Dental Anthropology: Health, Disease and Other Cool Stuff with Teeth

If for some reason you have a conflict (read: are busy eating beignets somewhere), here’s the finished poster, though the image will be updated once I discover those aforementioned typos.

I’ll also be posting a link to the pdf on my Academia.edu page. Until then, I hope to see many of you at the meetings!

If you have trouble spotting me, I will be wearing a blazer and covered in powdered sugar.

Posted in Biological Anthropology, Conferences, Teeth, Travel | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

SAA 2017 – Manipulated Bodies: Investigating Postmortem Interactions with Human Remains

I’m currently in Vancouver, spending a few extra days in the city after attending the 2017 Society for American Archaeology meetings. At the moment I’ve been waylaid by a merciless head cold, but you don’t have to be at the top of your game to appreciate how beautiful this city is.

As if this view wasn’t enough, I snapped this photo on my way to dim sum. DIM SUM!

As is my wont, I’ve spent my free time in the city immersing myself in the local culture (eating), catching up with old friends (eating), making professional connections (eating), and taking a few moments to stop at the conference center overlook and ruminate upon the majestic mountains (while eating).

On the last day of the conference, I was also able to find the time to visit the UBC Museum of Anthropology, which has a reputation for being one of the best anthropological museums in the world. It did not disappoint.

However, despite all of my gallivanting about the city (eating), I was actually in town for professional reasons. I presented a paper on March 30, in a Thursday evening symposium titled “Manipulated Bodies: Investigating Postmortem Interactions with Human Remains.”  My paper focused on evidence for the postmortem manipulation of human remains in Late Prehistoric Iberia, touching upon the Late Neolithic–Copper Age sites of Bolores and Perdigões in Portugal, and the Copper Age site of Marroquíes Bajos in Spain.

The session was organized by Elizabeth Craig-Atkins, senior lecturer in archaeology at the University of Sheffield. The papers were geographically chronologically wide-ranging: we moved from the British Neolithic to the Iberian Copper Age, followed by the British Bronze Age, Roman Iron Age, early Anglo Saxon period and medieval period, and closed with discussions of historical Romania, contemporary Britain, and Hong Kong. It was nothing if not an eclectic mix of papers.

Despite the diversity represented within these case studies, a number of overarching themes tied the session together. Many of the Late Prehistoric through Medieval papers touched upon communities’ frequent interaction with the dead, the selection of specific elements or individuals for burial, the movement of bones across and between mortuary spaces, the blurring of initial ritual context over time, and the repeated use of mortuary spaces, even over periods separated by hundreds of years. The historical and contemporary presentations demonstrated radical shifts in mortuary practices over the course of even one or two generations, particularly in tandem with larger changes in global economies, migration patterns, or political regimes.

Being a prehistory snob, I was surprised at the degree to which some of the papers on more recent societies resonated with things I had been thinking about in the context of my own research. For example, Steven Gallagher, who is a law professor at the Chinese University in Hong Kong, gave a presentation on secondary burial practices among the Chinese diaspora. In Hong Kong, secondary burial practices continue to this day, even in the face of tightly controlled regulations, underscoring the continuing importance of forms of forms of mortuary practice we often unthinkingly relegate to the prehistoric sphere. Similarly, the “Continuing Bonds” project introduced by Lindsay Büster uses archaeological case studies to facilitate discussions of death, dying, and bereavement between health care professionals and patients. This kind of work makes it clear that a modern Anglo-American perspective, where death is a taboo that is tightly spatially and temporally constrained, is insufficient for understanding the complex web of interactions between the living and the dead in the past.

Our discussant was Anna Osterholtz of Mississippi State University. In her discussion, she emphasized a series of intertwined themes that were woven throughout the papers in this session, including materiality and immateriality, as well as space and place. I found the latter two a particularly compelling pair to think about.

Rothwell Church

Many of the presentations, diverse as they were, resonated because I’ve recently been reading a lot of literature emphasizing the re-use of mortuary spaces at points in time quite distant from their initial construction. Within our session, Elizabeth Craig-Atkins and Dawn Hadley‘s papers on the Rothwell Charnel Chapel emphasized that three out of five recent radiocarbon dates fell between 1250 and 1450 AD, when archaeologists had anticipated that the chapel would have been used. However, surprisingly, the remaining two dates were from the 18th and 19th centuries, several hundred years later. Similarly, Ian Armit, of the University of Bradford, described the mortuary assemblages in the Covesea Caves of Northeast Scotland, which contained both Early Bronze Age (c. 2500-1500 BC) and Roman Iron Age human remains, from nearly a millennium later.

Covesea Caves

In my own presentation, I referenced a Copper Age mortuary area at the site of Marroquíes Bajos that shows Early Bronze Age reuse, several hundred years after the initial funerary depositions were made. I also described the site of Bolores, a Late Neolithic – Early Copper Age artificial rock shelter where ten burials have been dated to 2800-2600 BC…but an eleventh interment was dated to 1800 BC, nearly one thousand years later. My collaborator Colin Quinn has noted a similar pattern in the radiocarbon dates at the Bronze Age Mound of the Hostages in Tara, Ireland, where a single burial was interred in the mound several hundred years after all other mortuary activity had ceased.

Probably a fair bit of mnemonic density kicking about here.

All of this suggests that we as archaeologists need to be particularly attuned to the potential of mortuary sites to experience multiple periods of use and re-use in prehistory. In my own presentation, I referenced a term that archaeologist Katina Lillios has used to describe mortuary spaces in Late Prehistoric Iberia. She refers to a quality called mnemonic density, “the potency of spaces or things resulting from their repeated use over long periods of time and their accumulated…memories, associations, and meanings” (2014: 8). Though at first glance quite eclectic, the papers in the “Manipulated Bodies” session underscored the extent to which the re-use of mortuary space was an important element of many different kinds of prehistoric mortuary rituals, and that this attention to the mnemonic density of burial spaces was likely a recurring feature of prehistoric mortuary rituals in Europe.

The session has certainly given me many things to consider in my research going forward, which I suppose is the point of conferences (besides eating).

Image Credits: Continuing Bonds header from Continuing Bonds project website, here. Photograph of Rothwell Church from University of Sheffield, here. Covesea Caves photo from Society of Antiquaries of Scotland, here. Photo of Stonehenge from English Heritage, here.

Lillios, Katina T. 2015. Practice, Process, and Social Change in Third Millennium BC Europe: A View from the Sizandro Valley, Portugal. European Journal of Archaeology 18(2): 245-258.

Posted in Bioarchaeology, Conferences, Travel | Tagged , , , , | 3 Comments